Wednesday, September 8, 2010

"...It is a shining and affirmative thing, as fierce as red, as definite as black."

Now, those who are acquainted with philosophy (nay, religion) which is typified in the art of drawing on brown paper, know that white is positive and essential. I cannot avoid remarking here on a moral significance. One of the wise and awful truths which this brown-paper art reveals, is this, that white is a color. It is not a mere absence of color; it is a shining and affirmative thing, as fierce as red, as definite as black. When, so to speak, your pencil grows red-hot, it draws roses; when it grows white-hot, it draws stars. And one of the two or three defiant verities of the best religious morality, of real Christianity, for example, is exactly this same thing; the chief assertion of religious morality is that white is a color. Virtue is not the absence of vices or the avoidance of moral dangers; virtue is a vivid and separate thing, like pain or a particular smell. Mercy does not mean not being cruel or sparing people revenge or punishment; it means a plain and positive thing like the sun, which one has either seen or not seen. Chastity does not mean abstention from sexual wrong; it means something flaming, like Joan of Arc. In a word, God paints in many colors; but He never paints so gorgeously, I had almost said so gaudily, as when He paints in white.

Tremendous Trifles (1909)

2 comments:

  1. :) I love this way of thinking.

    Instead of virtues being the ABSENCE of a wrong, they are instead the fullness of a right. Or, at least, that's how my brain ordered it.

    The reason the 'white' is so stark and so vivid is because it is not common. The common colors blur into one and become so familiar that we hardly see them. But then the white comes along and it's so brilliant and so different that we wince away from it. It hurts the eyes.

    Phew, I need to stop sharing how my brain ordered this little excerpt!!! Or I'm going to end up in a circle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Instead of virtues being the ABSENCE of a wrong, they are instead the fullness of a right. Or, at least, that's how my brain ordered it.

    Exactly!

    Phew, I need to stop sharing how my brain ordered this little excerpt!!! Or I'm going to end up in a circle.

    :-)

    BTW, have you ever read anything by Chesterton?

    ReplyDelete