A series is issued entitled the "How To" series. It teaches in one
volume "How to Choose Your Banker,'' in another "How to Dine in Paris,"
and in a third, which now lies before us, "How to Write a Novel." It
never seems to strike the writers of this school that there is some
difference between the psychological profundity and delicacy of choosing
your banker and that of choosing your idea. An idea is a nameless
thing; it melts into all other ideas, whereas a banker is detachable and
does not melt into any one. The same is true, though in a lesser
degree, of the comparison which the author makes in his first chapter.
He says, with some apparent reason, that as painting and sculpture
require training on fixed lines there is no reason why such training
should not be given in fiction. Surely the answer is distinct. Fiction
is more dark and chaotic than painting because, though both arts
symbolise spiritual conditions, painting employs as its symbol the
bodily form, which has been measured, while fiction employs as its
symbol the thoughts and actions which have never been measured. Painting
deals with what a man looks like, which we can all know; fiction deals
with what he means, which he generally does not know himself. It is not
possible to know how many thoughts a man has; it is possible to know,
with reasonable industry, how many legs he has.
-March 23, 1901, The Speaker
:D I enjoyed this one!
ReplyDelete:-)
ReplyDelete