The Secularist constantly points out that the Hebrew and Christian
religions began as local things; that their god was a tribal god; that
they gave him material form, and attached him to particular places.
This
is an excellent example of one of the things that if I were conducting a
detailed campaign I should use as an argument for the validity of
Biblical experience. For if there really are some other and higher
beings than ourselves, and if they in some strange way, at some
emotional crisis, really revealed themselves to rude poets or dreamers
in very simply times, that these rude people should regard the
revelation as local, and connect it with the particular hill or river
where it happened, seems to me exactly what any reasonable human being
would expect. It has a far more credible look than if they had talked
cosmic philosophy from the beginning. If they had, I should have
suspected “priestcraft” and forgeries and third-century Gnosticism.
If
there be such a being as God, and He can speak to a child, and if God
spoke to a child in the garden, the child would of course, say that God
lived in the garden. I should not think it any less likely to be true
for that. If the child said: “God is everywhere: an impalpable essence
pervading and supporting all constituents of the Cosmos alike”- if, I
say, the infant addressed me in the above terms, I should think he was
much more likely to have been with the governess than with God.
So
if Moses had said God was an Infinite Energy, I should be certain he
had seen nothing extraordinary. As he said He was a Burning Bush, I
think it very likely that he did see something extraordinary. For
whatever be the Divine Secret, and whether or no it has (as all people
have believed) sometimes broken bounds and surged into our work, at
least it lies on the side furthest away from pedants and their
definitions, and nearest to the silver souls of quiet people, to the
beauty of bushes, and the love of one’s native place.
Thus, then,
in our last instance (out of hundreds that might be taken), we conclude
in the same way . When the learned sceptic says: “The visions of the
Old Testament were local, and rustic, and grotesque,” we shall answer:
“Of course. They were genuine.”
-"Christianity and Rationalism" (1904), The Blatchford Controversies
No comments:
Post a Comment