December 8, 1906, Illustrated London News
Quotes by and posts relating to one of the most influential authors of the 20th century, G.K. Chesterton
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Thursday, December 25, 2014
Saturday, December 13, 2014
"...it is not really so much a question of access to the facts, as of attitude to the facts."
It is true that, in most other cases, there was a certain
limitation to the data of medieval science; but this certainly had
nothing to do with medieval religion. For the data of Aristotle, and
the great Greek civilisation, were in many ways more limited still. But
it is not really so much a question of access to the facts, as of
attitude to the facts. Most of the Schoolmen, if informed by the only
informants they had that a unicorn has one horn or a salamander lives in
the fire, still used it more as an illustration of logic than an
incident of life. What they really said was, "If a Unicorn has one
horn, two unicorns have as many horns as one cow." And that has not one
inch the less a fact because the unicorn is a fable. But with Albertus
in medieval times, as with Aristotle in ancient times, there did begin
something like the idea of emphasising the question: "But does the
unicorn only have one horn or the salamander a fire instead of a
fireside?" Doubtless when the social and geographical limits of
medieval life began to allow them to search the fire for salamanders or
the desert for unicorns, they had to modify many of their scientific
ideas. A fact which will expose them to the very proper scorn of a
generation of scientists which has just discovered that Newton is
nonsense, that space is limited, and that there is no such thing as an
atom.
-St. Thomas Aquinas: The Dumb Ox (1933)
Sunday, December 7, 2014
"There is one very vile habit that the pedants have, and that is explaining to a man why he does a thing which the man himself can explain quite well- and quiet differently."
There is one very vile habit that the pedants have, and that is explaining to a man why he does a thing which the man himself can explain quite well- and quiet differently. If I go down on all-fours to find sixpence, it annoys me to be told by a passing biologist that I am really doing it because my remote ancestors were quadrupeds. I concede that he knows all about biology, or even a great deal about my ancestors; but I know he is wrong, because he does not know about the sixpence. If I climb a tree after a stray cat, I am unconvinced when a stray anthropologist tells me that I am doing it because I am essentially arboreal and barbaric. I happen to know why I am doing it; and I know it is because I am amiable and somewhat over-civilised. Scientists will talk to a man on general guess-work about things that they know no more about than about his pocket-money or his pet cat. Religion is one of them, and all the festivals and formalities that are rooted in religion. Thus a man will tell me that in keeping Christmas I am not keeping a Christian feast, but a pagan feast. This is exactly as if he told me that I was not feeling furiously angry, but only a little sad. I know how I am feeling all right; and why I am feeling it. I know this in the case of cats, sixpences, anger, and Christmas Day. When a learned man tells me that on the 25th of December I am really astronomically worshiping the sun, I answer that I am not. I am practicing a particular personal religion, the pleasures of which (right or wrong) are not in the least astronomical. If he says that the cult of Christmas and the cult of Apollo are the same, I answer that they are utterly different; and I ought to know, for I have held both of them. I believed in Apollo when I was quite little; and I believe in Christmas now that I am very, very big.
Let us not take with such smooth surrender these tenth-truths at tenth hand, such as the phrase that Christmas is pagan in origin. Let us note exactly how much it really means. It amounts, so far as our knowledge goes, solely to this- that primitive Scandinavians did hold a feast in mid-winter. What the dickens else could primitive Scandinavians do, especially in winter? That they put on the largest log in winter: do the professors expect such simple pagans to put on the largest log in summer? It amounts to this, again- that many tribes have either worshiped the sun or (more probably) compared some god or hero to the sun. Just so many a poet has compared his lady to the sun-without by any means intending that she was a Solar Myth. Thus, by talking a great deal about the solar solstice, it can be maintained that Christmas is a sort of sun-worship; to all of which the simple answer is that it feels quite different. If people profess to feel 'the spirit' behind symbols, the first thing I expect of them that they shall feel how opposite are the adoration of the sun and the following of the star
Let us not take with such smooth surrender these tenth-truths at tenth hand, such as the phrase that Christmas is pagan in origin. Let us note exactly how much it really means. It amounts, so far as our knowledge goes, solely to this- that primitive Scandinavians did hold a feast in mid-winter. What the dickens else could primitive Scandinavians do, especially in winter? That they put on the largest log in winter: do the professors expect such simple pagans to put on the largest log in summer? It amounts to this, again- that many tribes have either worshiped the sun or (more probably) compared some god or hero to the sun. Just so many a poet has compared his lady to the sun-without by any means intending that she was a Solar Myth. Thus, by talking a great deal about the solar solstice, it can be maintained that Christmas is a sort of sun-worship; to all of which the simple answer is that it feels quite different. If people profess to feel 'the spirit' behind symbols, the first thing I expect of them that they shall feel how opposite are the adoration of the sun and the following of the star
-The Spirit of Christmas (1984)
Friday, December 5, 2014
"...extending the powers of the law means something entirely different from extending the powers of the public."
People seem to forget that in a society where power goes with wealth and
where wealth is in an extreme state of inequality, extending the powers
of the law means something entirely different from extending the powers
of the public.
-Divorce Versus Democracy (1916)